Peter Grant -- The Wall Street Journal


Between February 1, 2007 and April 30, 2007, Peter Grant fell into the 65th percentile of all WSJ reporters for “byline points,” based upon a proprietary NewsBiosweighting system to separate ordinary bylines from high-visibility bylines. This means he fell into the “middle-third” of all WSJ reporters on a weighted basis.

During the same three-month period, Mr. Grant just missed being among the top 50 Wall Street Journal reporters for accumulating Front Page “byline points.”  On an unweighted, absolute byline count basis, Mr. Grant’s Front Page byline count ranked below only 24 other reporters at the paper

For the seven-month period, October 1, 2006 through April 30, 2007, Mr. Grant’s Page One weighted “byline points” ranked behind 53 other Journal reporters.  His total byline counts for the seven months, both weighted and absolute, did not qualify him among the top 75 reporters at the paper.

One way to interpret these numbers is that while Mr. Grant – who doubles as Deputy Technology Editor -- is not one of the paper’s star reporters – he is impressive in his ability to serve as a player/coach
.  It is further worth observing that a reporter’s initiative alone is not sufficient to ensure Front Page placement.  The nature of a journalist’s beat – and how newsworthy it is of late – also plays a large role in who rises to the very top of the byline rankings.

 
Although not all bylines are created equal – with some articles requiring substantially more research and effort than others – over time byline counts can be a strong indicator of a reporter’s relative influence within his/her own news organization. Editors at the Journal keep track of similar byline statistics, which are one measurement used in job performance reviews as well as to help determine beat assignments and promotions.


To order Mr. Grant's complete NewsBio for only $69.95, phone 1-866-NEWS-070, ext. 2 or click here.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.